Skip to Main Content

Research @ Bishop's University

Bishop's University is pleased to share its Data Management Strategy

 

1. Introduction

  i. Background

In 2016, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC), collectively referred to as the Tri-Agency published a Statement of Principles on Digital Data Management, outlining expectations and responsibilities for research data management within the academic community. This was followed by the introduction of the Tri-Agency Research Data Management Policy in March 2021. This policy, which aims to promote good research data management and stewardship practices among researchers, made it mandatory, by March 1, 2023, for all post-secondary educational institutions and research hospitals entitled to administer research funds to create and post on their websites their own research data management (RDM) strategy.

This document outlines how Bishop’s University will support its researchers in fulfilling the requirements of the Tri-Agency’s Research Data Management Policy and articulate the University’s commitment to research data management (RDM) at the institutional level.

At Bishop’s, the Institutional Research Data Management Strategy, herein referred to as the RDM Strategy, was drafted by a sub-committee set up by the Senate Research Committee (SRC) and inclusive of members from the SRC, Library and Learning Commons, and Information Technology Services.

The sub-committee drafted and circulated a survey to the University community to assess their knowledge of RDM and obtain feedback in drafting the RDM Strategy.

Once the RDM Strategy has been reviewed and accepted by the SRC, and by Senate, it will be posted on Bishop’s University’s website.

  ii. Purpose

Bishop’s University will endeavor to provide various supports to the research community to achieve RDM goals and requirements by various means, which include, but are not limited to data governance, privacy legislation, publishing requirements, documentation, preservation, storage, security, and training.

To this end, and in compliance with the Tri-Agency policy, Bishop’s University commits to:

     a) Creating and posting this institutional RDM strategy.

     b) Supporting researchers in using best practices in RDM and aiding with development and submission of data management plans (DMP).

     c) Supporting researchers in fulfilling their requirements for data deposit.

2. Scope

This strategy applies to all members of the Bishop’s community including faculty, staff, and students who engage in scholarship, research, and creative endeavors.

The goals and objectives identified in section 6 of this document communicate that Bishop’s University is committed to research excellence, and the associated actions define how it will assist its researchers in fulfilling their research data management obligations.

3. Guiding principles

Research, scholarship, and creative activity are integral to the mission, vision, and values of Bishop’s University. Consequently, the University recognizes the importance of research data and research data management.

  • Bishop’s University supports the Tri-Agency’s assertion that publicly funded research should – where ethical, legal, and commercial obligations allow – adhere to the “FAIR guiding principles of research data management” which emphasize that research data should be Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable.
  • Institutions play an important and expanding role in supporting RDM. Researchers need local support for the adoption of good data management practices.
    • According to Bishop’s University’s strategic research plan 2022-2024, one of the strategic priorities (strategic priority area #3) is to enhance supports for faculty researchers and creators. To accomplish this, one of the objectives is to provide enhanced administrative and Library Learning Commons support for the institutional repository, open access, and data management.
  • This strategy recognizes the diversity of the research fields and disciplines and therefore acknowledges that its application will vary widely from one discipline to another.
  • Individual responsibility: The principal investigator of a research project shall be responsible for the management of the research data related to their project. Bishop’s University commits to accompanying the principal investigator in producing a Data Management Plan (DMP) and advising on the appropriate repositories for storing data.
  • Ethics considerations: The benefits of research data management must never outweigh ethical considerations. Researchers must adhere to the highest ethical standards when collecting and managing data.
  • Indigenous Data sovereignty:
    • Data created in the context of research by, for, of, or with First Nations, Métis, and Inuit communities, collectives, and organizations will be managed according to principles developed and approved by said communities, collectives, and organizations, and in partnership with them. This recognition is also in line with, but not limited to the CARE and OCAP principles.
    • When dealing with Indigenous data, a distinctions-based approach is needed to ensure that the unique rights, interests, and circumstances of the First Nations, Métis, and Inuit are acknowledged, affirmed, and implemented.

4. Stakeholders

The creation and implementation of a successful RDM strategy at Bishop’s University requires the collaboration of many offices and groups, including (but not limited to):

  • Senate Research Committee (SRC)
  • Office of Research and Graduate Studies (ORGS)
  • Library Learning Commons (LLC)
  • Information Technology Services (ITS)
  • Research Ethics Board (REB)
  • Indigenous Student Support Centre (ISSC)
  • Indigenous Research and advancement groups.
  • Canada Research Chair in Digital indigeneities Indigenous Race and Research Axis (IRRA): Part of the Crossing Borders research cluster
  • Vice Principal Academic and Research (VPAR)
  • Departmental Chairs
  • Researchers
  • Archives

5. Institutional support and oversight

The LLC and ORGS staff are the primary contacts in relation to RDM. While the researchers are responsible for creating data, the LLC (with support from the ORGS) is committed to advising in the areas of collection management and proper deposit of research data with the appropriate repositories. Research Data Management will be tracked by ORGS.

The LLC and ORGS will work in tandem to accomplish the objectives of this strategy and report to the SRC who will oversee the evolution of RDM support to the campus community, and report to ITS, ISSC, the REB, and other appropriate stakeholders as needed.

In consultation with the stakeholders, the Senate Research Committee shall review this document every two years and update as needed.

  • This strategy should be considered as a living document. As such, it is expected to be reviewed and updated periodically to keep up with the various legal obligations, any changing requirements, and best practices.

6. Goals and objectives

 

This strategy is intended to:

  • Build a foundation for excellence in RDM at Bishop’s University;
  • Ensure full compliance with Tri-Agency’s RDM Policy;
  • Underline Bishop’s commitment to RDM and data management best practices.

Goal 1. Raise institutional awareness of RDM

Objectives:

  • Develop and release RDM strategy (June 2023).
  • Institutional recognition of research data as an important research output.
  • Promote the importance of data management to the Bishop’s community.

Actions:

  • Promote established best practices in sound research data management.
  • Create a user guide(s) to provide helpful and efficient access to relevant resources in the field of research data management. This guide will include resources such as templates, guides or checklists to help users:
    • Create data management plans (DMPs)
    • Know where and how to navigate the process of depositing their data into the appropriate repository.
  • Hold periodic consultations with the Bishop’s University research community, to assess ongoing RDM needs.
  • Report RDM activities to the SRC to monitor and assess the evolution of research support needs.
  • Review the RDM strategy every two years.
  • Work with the ITS department to ensure that researchers who collect and deposit data are taking the appropriate ethical, legal, and commercial considerations into account, as they pertain to data privacy obligations.
  • Work with the REB to ensure that researchers who are collecting and depositing data are taking the appropriate ethical, legal and commercial considerations into account when working with human subjects.
  • Work with the various Indigenous research and advancement groups on campus toward raising awareness and developing guidelines for Indigenous Data Sovereignty to ensure that:
    • Data will be managed according to principles developed and approved by and in partnership with them;
    • Indigenous communities’ unique rights, interests, and circumstances are acknowledged, affirmed, and implemented.

Goal 2. Develop RDM Training and Support.

Objectives:

  • Support researchers in learning about best practices for research data management.
    • Support established best practices for developing institutional policies on data management plans.
    • Support established best practices for collecting, documenting, storing, sharing, and preserving research data throughout a project, consistent with ethical, legal, and commercial obligations.

Actions:

  • Develop and offer regular training to researchers on how to properly manage data in accordance with the principles outlined in the Tri-Agency Statement of Principles on Digital Data Management, including the development of data management plans.
  • Monitor regional and national organizations that provide training opportunities and share with the research community.
  • Work towards the adoption of procedures for data management plans (DMPs).
  • Work towards the adoption of procedures for collecting, documenting, storing, sharing, and preserving research data throughout a project, consistent with ethical, legal, and commercial obligations.

Goal 3. Support sound management of research data.

Objectives:

  • Provide, or support access to, repository services or other platforms that securely preserve, curate and provide appropriate access to research data.
  • Promote and activate Bishop’s University’s instance in Canada’s Dataverse repository: Borealis.
  • Work toward establishing a more stable and user-friendly institutional repository.

Actions: 

  • Offer hands-on support and develop training materials to aid users in the appropriate procedures for depositing material in Borealis or other research data repositories such as the Federated Research Data Repository (FRDR).
  • Offer hands-on support and develop training materials to aid users in the appropriate procedures for depositing material in the Bishop’s institutional repository.
    • Re-evaluate the current institutional repository.
  • Participate in the regional and national RDM community to be informed on the latest developments and trends.

7. Definitions/acronyms

Borealis: The Canadian Dataverse repository: A national open data repository that supports open discovery, management, sharing, and preservation of Canadian research data. Borealis supports Canadian Academic libraries and research institutions.

CARE: Collective benefit, Authority to control, Responsibility, and Ethics

Data Archiving: the long-term storage of data. Publishing and archiving data is important to preserve scientific information for future research.

Data Deposit: when the research data collected as part of a research project are transferred to a research data repository. Ideally, data deposits will include accompanying documentation, source code, software, metadata, and any supplementary materials that provide additional information about the data, including the context in which it was collected and used to inform the research project. This additional information facilitates curation, discoverability, accessibility, and reuse of the data. "The choice of repository may be guided by disciplinary expectations and the recipient's own judgment, but in all cases the repository must ensure safe storage, preservation and curation of the data." (Tri-Agency RDM Policy Section 3.3) The Tri-Agency Research Data Management Policy does not require grant recipients to share their data. However, the agencies do expect researchers to provide appropriate access to the data, where ethical, cultural, legal, and commercial requirements allow, and in accordance with the FAIR principles and the standards of their disciplines.

  • Open data: data that are available to the public for download;
  • Mediated data: data that are behind a paywall or may require permission from an individual associated with the data;
  • Embargoed data: data that are deposited in a repository but are not available for download for a certain period of time, due to reasons such as waiting on manuscript publication.

Data Management Plan (DMP): A written document that describes the data you expect to acquire or generate over the course of a research project, how you will manage, describe, analyze, and store those data, and what mechanisms you will use at the end of your project to share and preserve your data.

Data Sharing: The action of providing access to research data. This can happen in a number of ways, including through mediated access, data enclaves, a journal website, or depositing data to a trusted repository.

FAIR: Data should be Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable. The Tri-Agency supports the FAIR guiding principles for data management and stewardship.

FRDR: Federated Research Data Repository: Supported by the Digital Research Alliance of Canada, the FRDR is a bilingual publishing platform for sharing and preserving Canadian research data.

Indigenous Data Sovereignty: The right of each First Nation, Métis, and Inuit community, collective, and organization to govern the collection, ownership, access, and possession of their own data.

Indigenous Research Data: Indigenous data are data involving Indigenous communities, beings, and land, and includes:

  • Data on Indigenous resources/environments such as land history, geological information, titles, water information.
  • Data about Indigenous demographics or social data such as legal, health, education, the use of services and Indigenous created data.
  • Data from Indigenous communities such as traditional cultural data, archives, oral literature, ancestral knowledge, community stories.

ISSC: Indigenous Student Support Centre

ITS: Information Technology Services

LLC: Library Learning Commons

OCAP: First nations principles of Ownership, Control, Access and Possession. It asserts that first nations have control over the data collection process and that they own and control how that information is used.

ORGS: Office of Research and Graduate Studies

Research Data: As per Research Data Canada’s definition, research data are data that are used as primary sources to support technical or scientific enquiry, research, scholarship, or artistic activity, and that are used as evidence in the research process and/or are commonly accepted in the research community as necessary to validate research findings and results. All other digital and nondigital content have the potential of becoming research data. Research data may be experimental data, observational data, operational data, third party data, public sector data, monitoring data, processed data, or repurposed data. (https://www.rdc-drc.ca/glossary/original-rdc-glossary/)

RDM: Research Data Management. The responsible collection, documentation, storage, sharing, and preservation of the data created or generated as part of a research project. Research Data Repository: a technology-based platform that allows for research data to be deposited & described, stored & archived, shared & published and discovered & reused.

REB: Research Ethics Board.